His father practised at the Paris bar, and his mother was a daughter of the great surgeon Ambroise Par? Fran?is H?elin was educated for his father's profession, but, after practising some time at Nemours he abandoned law, took holy orders, and was appointed tutor to one of Richelieu's nephews, the duc de Fronsac. This patronage secured for him the abbey Aubignac and of Mainac. The death of the duc de Fonsac in 1646 put an end to hopes of further preferment, and the abb?d'Aubignac retired to Nemours, occupying himself with literature till his death.
He took an energetic share in the literary controversies of his time. Against Gilles M?age he wrote a T?ence, justifi?/em> (1656); he laid claim having originated the idea of the "Carte de tendre" of Mlle de Scud?y's Cl?i?/em>; and after being a professed admirer of Corneille turned against him because he had neglected to mention the be in his Discours sur le po?e dramatique.
He was the author four tragedies: La Cyminde (1642), La Pucelle d'Orl?ns (1642), Z?obie (1647) and Le Martyre de Salute Catherine (1650). Z?obie was written with the intention of affording a model in which strict rules of the drama, as understood by the theorists, were served. In the choice of subjects for his plays, he seems to have been guided by a desire to illustrate the various kinds of tragedy--patriotic, antique and religious. The dramatic authors whom he was in the habit of criticizing were not slow to take advantage of the opportunity for retaliation offered by the production of these mediocre plays.
It is as a theorist that Aubignac still arrests attention. It has been proved that to him Chapelain belongs the credit of having been the first to sys so large a part in the history of the French stage; but the laws of dramatic method and construction generally were codified by d'Aubignac in his Pratique du th?tre. The book was only published in 1657, but had been begun at the desire of Richelieu as early as 1640. His Conjectures acad?iques sur la Iliade d'Hom?e, which was not published until nearly forty years after his death, threw doubts on the existence of Homer, and anticipated in some sense the conclusions of Friedrich August Wolf in his Prolegomena ad Homerum (1795).
The contents of the Pratique du th?tre are summarized by Ferdinand Bruneti?e in his notice of Aubignac in the Grande Encyclop?ie. See also G Saintsbury, Hist. of Criticism, bk. v., and H Rigault, de la querelle des anciens et modernes. (1859).
Reference